|
This Week in Washington
For the Week Ending December 15, 2000
This weekly report is written by the American Society of Civil Engineers? Government Relations staff. If you have questions or comments about any items in this report, please contact Brian Pallasch, Michael Charles, Martin Hight, Austin Fulk, or Liz Hermsen by e-mail or at 202/789-2200. Due to the upcoming holidays, This Week in Washington will not be published for the next two weeks and will resume on January 5. Have a safe and happy New Year! Inside This Week:
Final passage is expected the evening of Friday, December 15. A last minute disagreement between the Clinton Administration and Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK), Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee over Alaskan fishing rights had delayed passage but, as of press time, a deal had been reached and a vote was expected on the bill as early as 5 p.m. The House of Representatives and Senate are expected to permanently adjourn the 106th Congress shortly afterward.
A key feature of the legislation authorizes the first stages of a plan for the Army Corps of Engineers to revitalize the Florida Everglades over the next 36 years. The Everglades plan is widely supported by federal, state, and local governments, and environmental, agricultural, and development groups. The WRDA 2000 also includes provisions related to Corps of Engineers procedural and policy reforms. Among the reforms are National Academy of Sciences studies on independent peer review and project analysis of Corps projects, cost sharing based on a sponsor?s ability to pay, and monitoring of completed projects.
ASCE staff has been unable to review the final language in the bill, however we have learned the bill has been significantly improved over earlier drafts. Early versions of the legislation would have essentially let the manufactured housing industry police itself. A yearlong effort by ASCE has lead to significant improvements. ASCE however, remains concerned that the Act strays from the time tested consensus setting process administered by the American National Standards Institute, and used in most other areas of standards setting.
Opening ANWR's coastal plain, a 1.5-million-acre expanse also known as the 1002 area, is "not only a bad environmental idea, it's a bad economic idea and it's bad energy policy," said Robert F. Kennedy Jr, a lawyer for the Natural Resources Defense Council. Kennedy said "it's a trivial amount of oil" that will not even lower gasoline prices at the pump by one penny. The people who would benefit would be oil company executives, who have contributed generously to the GOP, he said. Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt, who in the past has recommended monument designations to the president, opposes designating a national monument in ANWR because of the strong objections of many Americans, including members of Congress. Sen. Bob Smith (R-NH), chair of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, has said he opposes any oil exploration in the ANWR, however. Congress has the power to override an executive order establishing a monument, and Babbitt fears that if Congress did so on ANWR, other monuments would also be vulnerable to repeal.
Transportation in Washington
It is unclear how the spending will be financed. Among the methods proposed by Locke are 11 new taxes, including a $.02 "odometer tax" on every vehicle mile driven; a two percent surcharge on sales of cars and car parts; an 8.2 percent tax on gasoline at the wholesale level; and an increase of the state's fuel tax from $.23 to $.29. Also, while the Washington Supreme Court recently overturned a 1998 ballot initiative that repealed the state's tax on vehicles, a major source of transportation revenue, backers of the initiative have vowed to re-enact it.
|
||||
|
||||